The Modern Day Neanderthal - Your Patient, the Office Worker
By Joel Johnston, DC and Mark A. King, DC
From an evolutionary perspective, humans are elite mammals. We are the only mammals capable of consistent bipedal locomotion.1 This bipedalism is something we take for granted, but it can itself cause problems.2
Initially, humans needed to cover variable terrain and hunt for food, all the while avoiding becoming a meal for a creature higher on the food chain. This required strength, endurance, flexibility, coordination, and balance. Waddell suggests these should be the normal functions of the locomotor system in modern man as well.3 It has been theorized that the need to avoid predators was the basis for the shift from quadrapedalism to bipedalism in the human.4 Regardless of why, there is consistency in thought on how humans have converted to bipedalism.1,2,5 The gluteus maximus muscle appears to play the key role in this conversion.1,2,5
The gluteus maximus is the largest skeletal muscle in the human body.6 It plays a much less significant role in the locomotor system of the quadripeds.1 It is critical for upright posture and proper hip extension during gait.7,8 In the human participating in a habitual seated posture, there is an approximation of the origin and insertion of the iliopsoas muscle. This creates shortening over time. This shortening over time will mechanically limit the hip extension capabilities of the gluteus maximus muscle, but it will also neurologically inhibit (via reciprocal inhibition) proper function and contraction of the gluteus maximus muscle.9 Decreased hip extension has direct implications on posture, and particularly on gait.10 It creates what Dananberg refers to as a global flexion response.10 Anterior head carriage is a secondary result of a flexion-engaged torso.
The average human takes one million strides per limb per year.10 Many conditions that a patient presents with in a chiropractic office could be a result of this postural problem, and subsequent gait abnormalities. It is not hard to imagine how even a subtle change in function can create an injury over time with this repetitive microtrauma.
Picture the gait of typical office workers after a normal day of prolonged sitting. As they stand, the iliopsoas fails to achieve full length, and when they begin to walk, hip extension is limited by mechanical and neurological constraints. This will shorten the stride, so that the person will walk mostly with movement at the knees. Also, the forward slouched posture the person has maintained all day has put a passive tensile load on the latissimus dorsi muscles and created shortening of the pectoralis group. This can create internal rotation of the humerus and will manifest as posterior facing palms on posture and gait observation.11 The global flexion of the torso also leads to the anterior head carriage mentioned earlier. This gait now somewhat mimics that of Neanderthals. Due to our quest for intellectual evolution, i.e., technological advancement, the locomotor system may be undergoing a regression in evolution.
Humans have successfully completed the quest to find more comfortable surroundings. There is no need for an elite locomotor system fully functioning to avoid a man-eating animal or to gather and hunt for food. Avoiding the I.R.S. and hunting in the back of the refrigerator for leftover pizza and the last of the six-pack hardly requires strength, endurance, flexibility, coordination, or balance.
A possible therapeutic intervention could include lengthening of shortened muscles, particularly the iliopsoas and pectoralis group, and other muscles shortened as a result of this habitual posture. Janda theorized that the inhibited muscles would recover automatically after stretching the shortened muscles.9 However, some basic facilitation of the gluteus maximus and the lower scapular stabilizers would also help. A few good exercises to start with can be found in Rehabilitation of the Spine (pp 374, 380),9 or chapter 25 of Conservative Management of Cervical Spine Syndromes.12 Addressing areas of joint dysfunction is also critical in this scenario.
- Lovejoy BO, Latimer B. Evolutionary aspects of human lumbosacral spine and bearing on the function of the lumbar intervertebral and sacroiliac joints. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. (eds.) Movement, Stability and Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997, ch. 16.
- Abitbol M. Quadrupedalism, bipedalism, and human pregnancy. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. (eds.) Movement, Stability and Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997, ch. 31.
- Waddle G. The Back Pain Revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1998, ch. 9.
- Leonard C. The Neuroscience of Human Movement. Mosby, St. Louis, 1998, ch. 5, pp 146-149.
- Gracovetsky S. The Spinal Engine. Springer-Verlang, Wien New York, 1988, ch. 1, p 15.
- Willard F. The muscular, ligamentous, and neural structure of the low back and its relation to pain. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. (eds.) Movement Stability and Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997, ch. 1, p 21.
- Lewit K. Manipulative Therapy in Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, 3rd ed. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1999, ch. 4, pp 137-139.
- Mooney V, Pozos R, Vleeming A, Gulick J, Swenski D. Coupled motion of the countralateral latissimus dorsi and gluteus maximus: its role in sacroiliac stabilization. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. (eds.) Movement in Stability and Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997, ch. 3, 7.
- Liebenson C. Rehabilitation of the Spine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1996, ch. 2, 6, pp 374, 380.
- Dananberg H. Lower back pain as a gait-related repetitive motion injury. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. (eds.) Movement Stability and Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997, ch. 21.
- Innes K. The effect of gait on extremity evaluation. In: Functional Soft Tissue Examination and Treatment by Manual Methods, 2nd ed. Aspen, Maryland, 1999, ch. 9, pp 363-364.
- Murphy D. Cervical Spine Syndromes. McGraw Hill, 2000, ch. 25.
Mark A. King,DC